The Official Blog of Matthew L. Adler

The Official Blog of Matthew L. Adler

Posts Tagged ‘debt’

Some Thoughts on 2010 — Part 1

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

2010 is almost here! I pride myself on being an optimist and always looking for the good in life.  Therefore, I am heading into the new year with hope that even though 2009 was a difficult year for everyone, I think 2010 will be an improvement.  I am not suggesting that the economy will come out of this crisis overnight, but I do think that we have bottomed and that in 2010 will see the start of a recovery.

This is the first in a series on what to expect in 2010.  The post below was written by Joel Levy. Joel is the Vice Chairman and former President of the Adler Group.  He has worked with my family for over 25 years and has been a significant mentor to me.  Having managed dozens of commercial real estate acquisitions and dispositions over three decades, Joel is uniquely qualified to offer thoughts for the new year. I intend on posting my thoughts and other guest posts over the coming weeks.

Some Thoughts on 2010 — Part 1

By Joel Levy

There are no lack of issues to discuss about commercial real estate and countless opinions as what to expect in 2010. In Matthew’s previous blogs, there has been a lot written about “Distress”, whether it be distressed assets, debt, owners, lenders, etc. etc. I however want to focus on one of the areas Adler Group intends to emphasize in the year ahead.

In 2009 we attempted to acquire properties from certain sellers who we did not believe were distressed, but who appeared ready to shed assets for various strategic reasons. It could have been a need to raise cash, a desire to sell an asset not core to their business or a desire to exit from a particular market. Let me report that as of now we have not been successful in this pursuit. Why you ask? It is really simple, an insurmountable spread between bid and ask. However, we now think that a narrowing of this spread is on the horizon. Are we being too optimistic or naïve? I hope not.

We have heard many opinions from various real estate professionals, and based on their and our own opinions we look to the new year with some optimism as to the narrowing of the pricing differential. Some of the issues are as follows:

  1. There is a very large amount of capital that has been on the sidelines or is currently being raised. We are believe that buyers will lower their return expectations and be more active acquirers.
  2. All signs are pointing to their being more available debt at better rates and slightly increased loan to value ratios.
  3. Sellers will be under more pressure to dispose of assets to fulfill their strategic goals as noted above. Many of the assets have recently been marked to market, making it easier to justify disposing of assets at lower prices.
  4. Although gradual in its impact, economic signs are improving and there will be an ability to underwrite a bit more positively.

While we intend to continue to pursue this path, we will also be in a pack of investors looking at distressed assets and debt.

Stay tuned for another interesting ride in the year ahead and more posts about the new year.

Corus Assets Sold To Starwood

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

The FDIC announced yesterday the winner of an extensive bidding process for the assets of now defunct Corus Bank which included some of the largest names in private equity.  The portfolio comprises mostly construction loans for residential condominiums. The winner was a group led by Starwood Capital Group. The most fascinating part of the deal was the incredibly innovative structure created by the FDIC.  The structure detailed in this Wall Street Journal Article allowed Starwood to invest equity of only $554 million for a portfolio that is estimated to have an original face value of over $5 billion. Although Starwood purchased controlling interest in the portfolio their ownership will only be 40%.  It is estimated that Starwood valued the portfolio at $2.77 billion and the remained funds were part of a series of equity and debt provided by the FDIC which is maintaining a 60% stake in the portfolio.

The structure of this deal is very compelling as it incentivized a company such as Starwood and their partners to enter into a long term strategy to workout these loans but still allows the FDIC the opportunity for significant upside participation.  I suspect, as the FDIC continues to close banks and control pools of loans that we will see more transactions of this kind.  It is pretty interesting that the FDIC in this transaction essentially  became the seller, the buyer, the lender and equity partner all at the same time.