The Official Blog of Matthew L. Adler

The Official Blog of Matthew L. Adler

Posts Tagged ‘Acquisitions’

Some Thoughts on 2010 — Part 1

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

2010 is almost here! I pride myself on being an optimist and always looking for the good in life.  Therefore, I am heading into the new year with hope that even though 2009 was a difficult year for everyone, I think 2010 will be an improvement.  I am not suggesting that the economy will come out of this crisis overnight, but I do think that we have bottomed and that in 2010 will see the start of a recovery.

This is the first in a series on what to expect in 2010.  The post below was written by Joel Levy. Joel is the Vice Chairman and former President of the Adler Group.  He has worked with my family for over 25 years and has been a significant mentor to me.  Having managed dozens of commercial real estate acquisitions and dispositions over three decades, Joel is uniquely qualified to offer thoughts for the new year. I intend on posting my thoughts and other guest posts over the coming weeks.

Some Thoughts on 2010 — Part 1

By Joel Levy

There are no lack of issues to discuss about commercial real estate and countless opinions as what to expect in 2010. In Matthew’s previous blogs, there has been a lot written about “Distress”, whether it be distressed assets, debt, owners, lenders, etc. etc. I however want to focus on one of the areas Adler Group intends to emphasize in the year ahead.

In 2009 we attempted to acquire properties from certain sellers who we did not believe were distressed, but who appeared ready to shed assets for various strategic reasons. It could have been a need to raise cash, a desire to sell an asset not core to their business or a desire to exit from a particular market. Let me report that as of now we have not been successful in this pursuit. Why you ask? It is really simple, an insurmountable spread between bid and ask. However, we now think that a narrowing of this spread is on the horizon. Are we being too optimistic or naïve? I hope not.

We have heard many opinions from various real estate professionals, and based on their and our own opinions we look to the new year with some optimism as to the narrowing of the pricing differential. Some of the issues are as follows:

  1. There is a very large amount of capital that has been on the sidelines or is currently being raised. We are believe that buyers will lower their return expectations and be more active acquirers.
  2. All signs are pointing to their being more available debt at better rates and slightly increased loan to value ratios.
  3. Sellers will be under more pressure to dispose of assets to fulfill their strategic goals as noted above. Many of the assets have recently been marked to market, making it easier to justify disposing of assets at lower prices.
  4. Although gradual in its impact, economic signs are improving and there will be an ability to underwrite a bit more positively.

While we intend to continue to pursue this path, we will also be in a pack of investors looking at distressed assets and debt.

Stay tuned for another interesting ride in the year ahead and more posts about the new year.

Distressed Real Estate Investing

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

Today, real estate companies fall more or less into two categories: ones crippled with distressed assets and those trying to purchase those assets at steep discounts. We are fortunate to be in the latter.

Every day we hear of a new company forming a distressed real estate fund.  Just last week Sam Zell announced the latest of these ventures.  We are also in the process of raising our own commercial real estate investment fund. However, while we plan on having a distressed allocation, our acquisition strategy will primarily focus on performing assets in the core plus and value add category.

At the Adler Group, we have a saying about this market: “we don’t want to buy distressed assets. We want to buy high quality assets, from distressed sellers”. Today at the Adler Group, we are focused on performing assets for a number of reasons.  Our primary rationale for adopting this investment strategy is our experience.  We have been successful in developing, acquiring, managing and leasing multi-tenant, management intensive commercial real estate for generations.  Distress in the market place isn’t a reason to depart from our core competency.

Our other reason is risk.  The investment management business is primarily about diversity and asset allocation.  We believe that all the money raised targeting “opportunistic” returns will compete for many of the same deals.  The competition for distressed deals may lead some to overpay for properties, thus over estimating the potential “risk adjusted return”.

On the other hand, with many focused on distressed properties and other historic buyers having left the market, few are focused on performing assets.  We project the targeted return on core plus and value add acquisitions to be 400 to 600 basis points higher than these same categories in 2007.  These higher targeted returns are theoretically intended for the same corresponding risk category.  However, there is no question that with less leverage and  more conservative underwriting there is actually less risk.  So in this cycle, we hope to make acquisitions taking less risk than years ago while targeting a significantly higher return.

Our company culture has always been to focus on singles and doubles rather than the home run.  We believe that the potential return on the acquisition of performing assets in the coming years will be attractive, particularly when compared to other investment alternatives.  We would be very happy to make relatively conservative acquisitions and achieve a return above sixteen percent.  If that turns out to be a single, I’m happy to be Ichiro and hit for average and leave the home runs (and the strike outs that inevitably accompany them) to others.